Regulatory Watch  /  United States (federal)  /  Proposed regulation
Moderate impactProposed regulationProposed

EPIC and consumer groups urge FTC to ban surveillance pricing, calling disclosure insufficient

On September 25, EPIC and several consumer groups filed comments with the FTC urging it to go beyond disclosure in its Proposed Enforcement Policy Statement on personalized pricing. The commenters argue that surveillance pricing violates the Section 5 unfairness test and that disclosure does not mitigate the harm. They request the FTC to use its Section 18 rulemaking authority to prohibit the practice.

Why it matters: The filing pushes the FTC to consider banning personalized pricing, potentially expanding consumer protection against data-driven price discrimination.

Summary generated from the sources below. Check the primary source before relying on it; this is not legal advice.

Sources
EPIC and Consumer Groups Urge FTC to Treat Surveillance Pricing as an Unfair Practice
EPIC · primary source · Sep 28, 2026
Details
JurisdictionUnited States (federal)
RegulatorFederal Trade Commission
LawFTC Act Section 5
StatusProposed
PublishedSeptember 28, 2026
Effectivenot stated
OrganisationsEPIC, Center for Digital Democracy, Consumer Federation of America, Demand Progress, National Consumers League, NYU Technology Law & Policy Clinic
Topicstransparency, profiling, targeted advertising, automated decision making, ai governance
Datapersonal