Medium severity · published Jun 10, 2026
CVE-2026-47734
Dulwich has unbounded memory allocation in receive-pack from crafted thin packs
5.7
CVSS
0.2%
EPSS
No
On KEV
Description
Dulwich is a pure-Python implementation of the Git file formats and protocols. Starting in version 0.1.0 and prior to version 1.2.5, a client with push access could push a tiny crafted thin pack (~174 bytes) whose delta header declares a huge dest_size. When dulwich ingested it via add_thin_pack / apply_delta, it would allocate hundreds of MB of memory based on that attacker-controlled size, with no relationship to the actual bytes received. Operators running a Dulwich-based Git server that exposes git-receive-pack (i.e. accepts pushes) - for example via dulwich.server functionality, the HTTP smart server, or anything built on ReceivePackHandler - are impacted. The issue is patched in 1.2.5. add_thin_pack now accepts a max_input_size keyword (bytes; 0/None = unlimited, matching git's semantics), and ReceivePackHandler reads receive.maxInputSize from the repository config and passes it through. Wire reads are counted and a PackInputTooLarge exception is raised once the cap is exceeded - equivalent to git index-pack --max-input-size. Users should upgrade to Dulwich 1.2.5 or later and set receive.maxInputSize in their server's repository config to a sane bound for their environment. On unpatched versions, receive.maxInputSize has no effect, so it cannot be used as a workaround. Until upgrading, operators should restrict dulwich-receive-pack (push) access to trusted, authenticated clients only, or disable it entirely on servers that only need to serve fetches and/or run the server under an OS-level memory limit (e.g. ulimit, cgroups/MemoryMax, or a container memory limit) so a malicious push is killed rather than taking down the host.
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High
Scope
Unchanged
Exploitation
Is it being used?
Exploit prediction (EPSS)0.2% · higher than 8% of CVEs
Exploited in the wildNo evidence yet
CISA KEVNot listed
Ransomware campaign useNot known
Affected products
Which versions
DU
dulwich · jelmer
>= 0.1.0, < 1.2.5 · source: vendor
References
NVD
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-47734
CVE.org
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47734
github.com
https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/releases/tag/dulwich-1.2.5
github.com
https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/security/advisories/GHSA-xrvj-v92f-53gj
More from dulwich
8.8
CVE-2026-114094
Dulwich before 1.2.9 Arbitrary File Write via DOS drive letter paths
8.8
CVE-2026-42305
Dulwich has an arbitrary file write via NTFS-hostile tree entries on Windows
7.8
CVE-2026-114098
Dulwich 0.22.5 before 1.2.8 Path Traversal via Stash Pop Symlinks
7.8
CVE-2026-114097
Dulwich 0.23.1 before 1.2.8 Symlink Path Traversal via filter_branch Index Filter
7.8
CVE-2026-114096
Dulwich 0.24.0 before 1.2.8 Symlink Write-Through via porcelain.checkout paths
