Medium severity · published Jan 21, 2026
CVE-2025-12781
When passing data to the b64decode(), standard_b64decode(), and urlsafe_b64decode() functions in the "base64" module the characters "+/" will always be accepted, regardless of the…
5.3
CVSS
0.9%
EPSS
No
On KEV
Description
When passing data to the b64decode(), standard_b64decode(), and urlsafe_b64decode() functions in the "base64" module the characters "+/" will always be accepted, regardless of the value of "altchars" parameter, typically used to establish an "alternative base64 alphabet" such as the URL safe alphabet. This behavior matches what is recommended in earlier base64 RFCs, but newer RFCs now recommend either dropping characters outside the specified base64 alphabet or raising an error. The old behavior has the possibility of causing data integrity issues.
This behavior can only be insecure if your application uses an alternate base64 alphabet (without "+/"). If your application does not use the "altchars" parameter or the urlsafe_b64decode() function, then your application does not use an alternative base64 alphabet.
The attached patches DOES NOT make the base64-decode behavior raise an error, as this would be a change in behavior and break existing programs. Instead, the patch deprecates the behavior which will be replaced with the newly recommended behavior in a future version of Python. Users are recommended to mitigate by verifying user-controlled inputs match the base64
alphabet they are expecting or verify that their application would not be
affected if the b64decode() functions accepted "+" or "/" outside of altchars.
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None
Scope
Unchanged
Exploitation
Is it being used?
Exploit prediction (EPSS)0.9% · higher than 58% of CVEs
Exploited in the wildNo evidence yet
CISA KEVNot listed
Ransomware campaign useNot known
Affected products
Which versions
PY
Python · Python
before 3.13.10; 3.14.0 before 3.14.1; 3.15.0 · source: NVD
References
NVD
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-12781
CVE.org
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12781
Patch
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/13360efd385d1a7d0659beba03787ea3d063ef9b
Patch
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/1be80bec7960f5ccd059e75f3dfbd45fca302947
Patch
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/9060b4abbe475591b6230b23c2afefeff26fcca5
Patch
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/e95e783dff443b68e8179fdb57737025bf02ba76
Patch
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/fd17ee026fa9b67f6288cbafe374a3e479fe03a5
Exploit
https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/125346
More from Python
9.8
CVE-2022-48565
An XML External Entity (XXE) issue was discovered in Python through 3.9.1
9.8
CVE-2022-37454
The Keccak XKCP SHA-3 reference implementation before fdc6fef has an integer overflow and resultant buffer overflow that allows attackers to execute arbitrary code or eliminate…
9.8
CVE-2021-29921
In Python before 3,9,5, the ipaddress library mishandles leading zero characters in the octets of an IP address string
9.8
CVE-2021-3177
Python 3.x through 3.9.1 has a buffer overflow in PyCArg_repr in _ctypes/callproc.c, which may lead to remote code execution in certain Python applications that accept…
9.8
CVE-2020-27619
In Python 3 through 3.9.0, the Lib/test/multibytecodec_support.py CJK codec tests call eval() on content retrieved via HTTP
