Medium severity · published Apr 8, 2025
CVE-2025-0361
During an annual penetration test conducted on behalf of Axis Communications, Truesec discovered a flaw in the VAPIX Device Configuration framework that allowed for…
5.3
CVSS
0.3%
EPSS
No
On KEV
Description
During an annual penetration test conducted on behalf of Axis Communications, Truesec discovered a flaw in the VAPIX Device Configuration framework that allowed for unauthenticated username enumeration through the VAPIX Device Configuration SSH Management API.
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None
Scope
Unchanged
Exploitation
Is it being used?
Exploit prediction (EPSS)0.3% · higher than 26% of CVEs
Exploited in the wildNo evidence yet
CISA KEVNot listed
Ransomware campaign useNot known
Affected products
Which versions
AO
Axis OS · Axis
11.11.0 before 12.3.56 · source: NVD
AO
Axis OS 2024 · Axis
before 11.11.141 · source: NVD
References
NVD
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-0361
CVE.org
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0361
Vendor Advisory
https://www.axis.com/dam/public/f4/9b/13/cve-2025-0361pdf-en-US-474511.pdf
More from Axis OS
8.8
CVE-2026-1185
A configuration file on the local file system had improper input validation which could allow code execution and potentially lead to privilege escalation
8.8
CVE-2025-11142
The VAPIX API mediaclip.cgi that did not have a sufficient input validation allowing for a possible remote code execution
8.8
CVE-2025-0358
During an annual penetration test conducted on behalf of Axis Communication, Truesec discovered a flaw in the VAPIX Device Configuration framework that allowed a privilege…
8.8
CVE-2025-0324
The VAPIX Device Configuration framework allowed a privilege escalation, enabling a lower-privileged user to gain administrator privileges
8.8
CVE-2023-5800
Vintage, member of the AXIS OS Bug Bounty Program, has found that the VAPIX API create_overlay.cgi did not have a sufficient input validation allowing for a possible remote code…