High severity · published Feb 22, 2023
CVE-2023-25579
Nextcloud server is a self hosted home cloud product
7.5
CVSS
0.5%
EPSS
No
On KEV
Description
Nextcloud server is a self hosted home cloud product. In affected versions the `OC\Files\Node\Folder::getFullPath()` function was validating and normalizing the string in the wrong order. The function is used in the `newFile()` and `newFolder()` items, which may allow to creation of paths outside of ones own space and overwriting data from other users with crafted paths. This issue has been addressed in versions 25.0.2, 24.0.8, and 23.0.12. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this issue.
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None
Scope
Unchanged
Exploitation
Is it being used?
Exploit prediction (EPSS)0.5% · higher than 43% of CVEs
Exploited in the wildNo evidence yet
CISA KEVNot listed
Ransomware campaign useNot known
Affected products
Which versions
NS
Nextcloud Server · Nextcloud
before 23.0.12; 20.0.0 before 20.0.14; 21.0.0 before 21.0.9; 22.2.0 before 22.2.10; 23.0.0 before 23.0.12; 24.0.0 before 24.0.8; +3 more · source: NVD
References
NVD
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-25579
CVE.org
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25579
Vendor Advisory
https://github.com/nextcloud/security-advisories/security/advisories/GHSA-273v-9h7x-p68v
Patch
https://github.com/nextcloud/server/pull/35074
More from Nextcloud Server
9.8
CVE-2023-49792
Nextcloud Server provides data storage for Nextcloud, an open source cloud platform
9.8
CVE-2023-48306
Nextcloud Server provides data storage for Nextcloud, an open source cloud platform
9.8
CVE-2021-32802
Nextcloud server is an open source, self hosted personal cloud
9.8
CVE-2021-32726
Nextcloud Server is a Nextcloud package that handles data storage
9.8
CVE-2021-22915
Nextcloud server before 19.0.11, 20.0.10, 21.0.2 is vulnerable to brute force attacks due to lack of inclusion of IPv6 subnets in rate-limiting considerations
