High severity · published May 26, 2021
CVE-2021-25217
In ISC DHCP 4.1-ESV-R1 -> 4.1-ESV-R16, ISC DHCP 4.4.0 -> 4.4.2 (Other branches of ISC DHCP (i.e., releases in the 4.0.x series or lower and releases in the 4.3.x series) are…
7.4
CVSS
6.1%
EPSS
No
On KEV
Description
In ISC DHCP 4.1-ESV-R1 -> 4.1-ESV-R16, ISC DHCP 4.4.0 -> 4.4.2 (Other branches of ISC DHCP (i.e., releases in the 4.0.x series or lower and releases in the 4.3.x series) are beyond their End-of-Life (EOL) and no longer supported by ISC. From inspection it is clear that the defect is also present in releases from those series, but they have not been officially tested for the vulnerability), The outcome of encountering the defect while reading a lease that will trigger it varies, according to: the component being affected (i.e., dhclient or dhcpd) whether the package was built as a 32-bit or 64-bit binary whether the compiler flag -fstack-protection-strong was used when compiling In dhclient, ISC has not successfully reproduced the error on a 64-bit system. However, on a 32-bit system it is possible to cause dhclient to crash when reading an improper lease, which could cause network connectivity problems for an affected system due to the absence of a running DHCP client process. In dhcpd, when run in DHCPv4 or DHCPv6 mode: if the dhcpd server binary was built for a 32-bit architecture AND the -fstack-protection-strong flag was specified to the compiler, dhcpd may exit while parsing a lease file containing an objectionable lease, resulting in lack of service to clients. Additionally, the offending lease and the lease immediately following it in the lease database may be improperly deleted. if the dhcpd server binary was built for a 64-bit architecture OR if the -fstack-protection-strong compiler flag was NOT specified, the crash will not occur, but it is possible for the offending lease and the lease which immediately followed it to be improperly deleted.
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High
Scope
Changed
Exploitation
Is it being used?
Exploit prediction (EPSS)6.1% · higher than 93% of CVEs
Exploited in the wildNo evidence yet
CISA KEVNot listed
Ransomware campaign useNot known
Affected products
Which versions
DL
Debian Linux · Debian
9.0 · source: NVD
DH
Dhcp · Isc
4.4.0 through 4.4.2; 4.1-esv; 4.1-esv; 4.1-esv; 4.1-esv; 4.1-esv; +23 more · source: NVD
FE
Fedora · Fedoraproject
33; 34 · source: NVD
OS
Ontap Select Deploy Administration Utility · Netapp
All versions, or not specified · source: NVD
RR
Ruggedcom Rox Mx5000 Firmware · Siemens
2.3.0 before 2.15.0 · source: NVD
RR
Ruggedcom Rox Rx1400 Firmware · Siemens
before 2.15.0 · source: NVD
RR
Ruggedcom Rox Rx1500 Firmware · Siemens
2.3.0 before 2.15.0 · source: NVD
RR
Ruggedcom Rox Rx1501 Firmware · Siemens
2.3.0 before 2.15.0 · source: NVD
RR
Ruggedcom Rox Rx1510 Firmware · Siemens
2.3.0 before 2.15.0 · source: NVD
RR
Ruggedcom Rox Rx1511 Firmware · Siemens
2.3.0 before 2.15.0 · source: NVD
RR
Ruggedcom Rox Rx1512 Firmware · Siemens
2.3.0 before 2.15.0 · source: NVD
RR
Ruggedcom Rox Rx1524 Firmware · Siemens
before 2.15.0 · source: NVD
References
NVD
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-25217
CVE.org
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-25217
Mailing List
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/05/26/6
Patch
https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-406691.pdf
Patch
https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-637483.pdf
Exploit
https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2021-25217
Mailing List
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/06/msg00002.html
lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5QI4DYC7J4BGHEW3NH4XHMWTHYC36UK4/
More from Debian Linux
10.0
CVE-2025-32433
Erlang/OTP SSH Vulnerable to Pre-Authentication RCE
10.0
CVE-2025-24201
Apple Multiple Products WebKit Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability
10.0
CVE-2021-44228
Apache Log4j2 JNDI features do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints
10.0
CVE-2015-3306
ProFTPD Improper Access Control Vulnerability
9.8
CVE-2026-24061
GNU InetUtils Argument Injection Vulnerability
