Unscored severity · published Jan 17, 2013
CVE-2012-6392
Cisco Prime LAN Management Solution (LMS) 4.1 through 4.2.2 on Linux does not properly validate authentication and authorization requests in TCP sessions, which allows remote…
–
CVSS
4.6%
EPSS
No
On KEV
Description
Cisco Prime LAN Management Solution (LMS) 4.1 through 4.2.2 on Linux does not properly validate authentication and authorization requests in TCP sessions, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted session, aka Bug ID CSCuc79779.
Exploitation
Is it being used?
Exploit prediction (EPSS)4.6% · higher than 92% of CVEs
Exploited in the wildNo evidence yet
CISA KEVNot listed
Ransomware campaign useNot known
Affected products
Which versions
PL
Prime Lan Management Solution · Cisco
4.1; 4.2; 4.2.1; 4.2.2 · source: NVD
References
NVD
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-6392
CVE.org
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-6392
Vendor Advisory
http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20130109-lms
More from Prime Lan Management Solution
7.1
CVE-2016-1360
Cisco Prime LAN Management Solution (LMS) through 4.2.5 uses the same database decryption key across different customers' installations, which allows local users to obtain…
6.5
CVE-2017-12225
A vulnerability in the web functionality of the Cisco Prime LAN Management Solution could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to hijack another user's administrative session,…
–
CVE-2015-0594
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the help pages in Cisco Common Services, as used in Cisco Prime LAN Management Solution (LMS) and Cisco Security Manager,…
–
CVE-2013-5482
Cisco Prime LAN Management Solution (LMS) does not properly restrict use of IFRAME elements, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct clickjacking attacks and…
–
CVE-2013-5488
Cisco Common Services, as used in Cisco Prime LAN Management Solution (LMS), Cisco Security Manager, Cisco Unified Service Monitor, and Cisco Unified Operations Manager, does not…