Medium severity · published Sep 1, 2020
CVE-2012-3341
IBM InfoSphere Guardium 7.0, 8.0, 8.01, and 8.2 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting, caused by improper validation of user-supplied input
5.4
CVSS
0.7%
EPSS
No
On KEV
Description
IBM InfoSphere Guardium 7.0, 8.0, 8.01, and 8.2 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting, caused by improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability using a specially-crafted URL to execute script in a victim's Web browser within the security context of the hosting Web site, once the URL is clicked. An attacker could use this vulnerability to steal the victim's cookie-based authentication credentials. IBM X-Force ID: 78294.
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None
Scope
Changed
Exploitation
Is it being used?
Exploit prediction (EPSS)0.7% · higher than 54% of CVEs
Exploited in the wildNo evidence yet
CISA KEVNot listed
Ransomware campaign useNot known
Affected products
Which versions
IG
Infosphere Guardium · Ibm
7.00; 8.0; 8.0.1; 8.2 · source: NVD
References
NVD
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-3341
CVE.org
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-3341
Broken Link
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21611131
VDB Entry
https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/78294
More from Infosphere Guardium
8.8
CVE-2012-3336
IBM InfoSphere Guardium 8.0, 8.01, and 8.2 is vulnerable to SQL injection
5.5
CVE-2012-2204
InfoSphere Guardium aix_ktap module: DoS
5.3
CVE-2012-3338
IBM InfoSphere Guardium 8.0, 8.01, and 8.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions, caused by improper restrictions on the create new user account…
5.3
CVE-2012-3337
IBM InfoSphere Guardium 8.0, 8.01, and 8.2 could allow a remote attacker to traverse directories on the system
4.3
CVE-2012-3340
IBM InfoSphere Guardium 8.0, 8.01, and 8.2 is vulnerable to XML external entity injection, caused by improper validation of user-supplied input