Unscored severity · published Jan 13, 2010
CVE-2009-4212
Multiple integer underflows in the (1) AES and (2) RC4 decryption functionality in the crypto library in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.3 through 1.6.3, and 1.7 before 1.7.1, allow…
–
CVSS
7.6%
EPSS
No
On KEV
Description
Multiple integer underflows in the (1) AES and (2) RC4 decryption functionality in the crypto library in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.3 through 1.6.3, and 1.7 before 1.7.1, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code by providing ciphertext with a length that is too short to be valid.
Exploitation
Is it being used?
Exploit prediction (EPSS)7.6% · higher than 94% of CVEs
Exploited in the wildNo evidence yet
CISA KEVNot listed
Ransomware campaign useNot known
Affected products
Which versions
KE
Kerberos · Mit
5-1.6.3 · source: NVD
K5
Kerberos 5 · Mit
1.3; 1.3.1; 1.3.2; 1.3.3; 1.3.4; 1.3.5; +14 more · source: NVD
References
NVD
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-4212
CVE.org
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2009-4212
lists.apple.com
http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2010//Jun/msg00001.html
lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-January/033915.html
lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-January/033919.html
marc.info
http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=130497213107107&w=2
secunia.com
http://secunia.com/advisories/38080
secunia.com
http://secunia.com/advisories/38108
More from Kerberos
7.5
CVE-2018-5709
An issue was discovered in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) through 1.16
6.5
CVE-2018-5710
An issue was discovered in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) through 1.16
6.5
CVE-2017-11368
In MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.7 and later, an authenticated attacker can cause a KDC assertion failure by sending invalid S4U2Self or S4U2Proxy requests
5.3
CVE-2018-20217
A Reachable Assertion issue was discovered in the KDC in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) before 1.17
3.7
CVE-2010-1323
MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.3.x, 1.4.x, 1.5.x, 1.6.x, 1.7.x, and 1.8.x through 1.8.3 does not properly determine the acceptability of checksums, which might allow remote attackers…