Unscored severity · published Apr 16, 2009
CVE-2009-0579
Linux-PAM before 1.0.4 does not enforce the minimum password age (MINDAYS) as specified in /etc/shadow, which allows local users to bypass intended security policy and change…
–
CVSS
0.3%
EPSS
No
On KEV
Description
Linux-PAM before 1.0.4 does not enforce the minimum password age (MINDAYS) as specified in /etc/shadow, which allows local users to bypass intended security policy and change their passwords sooner than specified.
Exploitation
Is it being used?
Exploit prediction (EPSS)0.3% · higher than 28% of CVEs
Exploited in the wildNo evidence yet
CISA KEVNot listed
Ransomware campaign useNot known
Affected products
Which versions
LI
Linux-pam · Linux-pam
through 1.0.4; 0.99.1.0; 0.99.2.0; 0.99.2.1; 0.99.3.0; 0.99.4.0; +15 more · source: NVD
References
NVD
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-0579
CVE.org
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2009-0579
bugs.debian.org
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=514437
Vendor Advisory
http://secunia.com/advisories/34728
Vendor Advisory
http://secunia.com/advisories/34733
Patch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487216
www.redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-April/msg00398.html
Patch
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-April/msg00420.html
More from Linux-pam
9.8
CVE-2022-28321
The Linux-PAM package before 1.5.2-6.1 for openSUSE Tumbleweed allows authentication bypass for SSH logins
9.8
CVE-2020-27780
A flaw was found in Linux-Pam in versions prior to 1.5.1 in the way it handle empty passwords for non-existing users
6.5
CVE-2015-3238
The _unix_run_helper_binary function in the pam_unix module in Linux-PAM (aka pam) before 1.2.1, when unable to directly access passwords, allows local users to enumerate…
5.9
CVE-2026-54411
Linux-PAM pam_userdb Observable Timing Discrepancy in Plaintext Password Comparison
5.5
CVE-2024-22365
linux-pam (aka Linux PAM) before 1.6.0 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (blocked login process) via mkfifo because the openat call (for protect_dir) lacks O_DIRECTORY
