Unscored severity · published Apr 2, 2003
CVE-2003-0082
The Key Distribution Center (KDC) in Kerberos 5 (krb5) 1.2.7 and earlier allows remote, authenticated attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) on KDCs within the same realm…
–
CVSS
2.7%
EPSS
No
On KEV
Description
The Key Distribution Center (KDC) in Kerberos 5 (krb5) 1.2.7 and earlier allows remote, authenticated attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) on KDCs within the same realm using a certain protocol request that causes the KDC to corrupt its heap (aka "buffer underrun").
Exploitation
Is it being used?
Exploit prediction (EPSS)2.7% · higher than 86% of CVEs
Exploited in the wildNo evidence yet
CISA KEVNot listed
Ransomware campaign useNot known
Affected products
Which versions
KE
Kerberos · Mit
1.0; 1.2.2.beta1 · source: NVD
K5
Kerberos 5 · Mit
1.0.6; 1.1; 1.1.1; 1.2; 1.2.1; 1.2.2; +6 more · source: NVD
References
NVD
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2003-0082
CVE.org
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2003-0082
sunsolve.sun.com
http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-26-54042-1
Patch
http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/www/advisories/MITKRB5-SA-2003-005-buf.txt
Patch
http://www.debian.org/security/2003/dsa-266
www.redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2003-051.html
www.redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2003-052.html
www.redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2003-091.html
More from Kerberos
7.5
CVE-2018-5709
An issue was discovered in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) through 1.16
6.5
CVE-2018-5710
An issue was discovered in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) through 1.16
6.5
CVE-2017-11368
In MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.7 and later, an authenticated attacker can cause a KDC assertion failure by sending invalid S4U2Self or S4U2Proxy requests
5.3
CVE-2018-20217
A Reachable Assertion issue was discovered in the KDC in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) before 1.17
3.7
CVE-2010-1323
MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.3.x, 1.4.x, 1.5.x, 1.6.x, 1.7.x, and 1.8.x through 1.8.3 does not properly determine the acceptability of checksums, which might allow remote attackers…